Wednesday, 29 February 2012

To what extent are Hollywood films simply ‘products’ made to make a profit?

One of the key purposes of film entertainment has always been the making of money, though there is a myriad of ‘uses and gratifications’. Films can also be used for diversion, information and news-gathering, social interacting through personal relationships and personal identity. The Hollywood film industry, however, is notorious for its supposed main aim of simply making money. One could argue that George Lucas is a prime example of a film director who has created a franchise and rides upon its financial success. His last role as an active director was in 2005 during the last Star Wars film, since then he has remained in the background ‘producer’ position and has had a minor directing role in 2012’s ‘Red Tails’. Though Lucas is one of Hollywood’s most successful directors, his portfolio is not as extensive as other veteran directors, such as Woody Allen and Martin Scorsese – both infamous for their strong and constant work ethic. ‘Star Wars’ is also a good example of how Hollywood are fond of making sequels and also prequels – in order to extend the commercial success of a film. This is notable in Dreamwork’s productions such as Kung Fu Panda, which spawned a recent sequel and the Shrek series, which made a decline in critical appreciation as the series went on to its third and fourth films.
The digital age has shaken up the industry, with many film bosses realising the need for a more immersive experience, rather than an audience experience – viwers now want to feel involved in film’s action. Auteurs like Quentin Tarantino have rejected these new styles of editing and shooting, whereas others – even veteran Martin Scorsese has explored 3D filming in his winter release ‘Hugo’. James Cameron exploited the sudden craze in cinema-goers for 3D and Imax with his special effects extravaganza in 2009 ‘Avatar’. This went on to become the highest grossing film of all time, due to the viral and word-of-mouth hype which spread through its notoriety as a visually immersive experience.

Weinstein Company warned to back down in Bully classification row

Cinema owners warn that all future Weinstein films could get an NC-17 rating if company boycotts MPAA ratings in row over its anti-bullying documentary


Harvey Weinstein
Ratings row ... Harvey Weinstein has been warned not to boycott MPAA's ratings following a row over documentary Bully. Photograph: Danny Martindale/WireImage
Oscar-winning film producer Harvey Weinstein has been warned not to pursue his current high-profile campaign against the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) over its prohibitive rating for the documentary Bully.


Weinstein and his brother Bob, who have been instrumental in bringing the anti-bullying film to the big screen through The Weinstein Company, are unhappy the documentary has been handed an R rating, which means many of its target audience will not be able to see it in cinemas, and have threatened to boycott the MPAA's rating process altogether over the decision.

However, the National Association of Theatre Owners (NATO), which represents cinemas, said earlier this week that any such move might result in all Weinstein Company films being handed an automatic NC-17 rating in future.

"If you decide to withdraw our support and participation in the rating system and begin to release movies without ratings, I will have no choice but to encourage my theatre-owner members to treat unrated movies from the Weinstein Co in the same manner as they treat unrated movies from anyone else," NATO president John Fithian wrote in a letter to the Weinsteins.

He added: "As a father of a nine-year-old child, I am personally grateful that TWC has addressed the important issue of bullying in such a powerful documentary. Yet were the MPAA and NATO to waive the ratings rules whenever we believed that a particular movie had merit, or was somehow more important than other movies, we would no longer be neutral parties applying consistent standards, but rather censors of content based on personal mores."

The Weinsteins hit back with a statement of their own which referenced a recent high-school shooting in suburban Cleveland in which a student who was allegedly the victim of bullying shot dead three other teenagers. "As a company we have the utmost respect for NATO, but to suggest that the film Bully could ever be treated like an NC-17 film is completely unconscionable, not to mention unreasonable," they wrote. "In light of the tragedy that occurred yesterday in Ohio, we feel now is the time for the bullying epidemic to take centre stage, we need to demand our community take action."

More than 75,000 people have signed an online petition urging the MPAA to overturn the R rating handed to Lee Hirsch's film, a decision which was made on the grounds of language. There are said to be six instances of the word "fuck" being used in the documentary, which is due to open on 23 March in the US.


While the MPAA ratings are in theory not legally binding, they are firmly established in the US and any breakdown of the current voluntary system would risk the appointment of a more prohibitive federal or state-appointed censor, something neither studios, film-makers or cinema owners would want.

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

Finnish sci-fi Nazi movie is hot ticket at Berlin film festival

Iron Sky, which imagines Nazi invasion from secret moon base, sells more tickets than Werner Herzog and Angelina Jolie films.
Berlin film festival
The queue for tickets at the Berlin film festival. Photograph: Fabrizio Bensch/Reuters
There are a lot of worthy films premiering at the Berlin film festival over the coming 10 days. A three-and-a-half-hour epic tracing China's history, three documentaries about the Fukushima disaster, Werner Herzog's look at Death Row and Angelina Jolie's take on the Bosnian war.
But which film proved more popular than almost anything else the day the tickets went on sale? A Finnish sci-fi comedy about Nazis living on the dark side of the moon.
Iron Sky tells the story of how Hitler's top scientists moved to a lunar military base known as the Black Sun shortly after the second world war ended in 1945. For more than 70 years boffins beavered away on a fleet of spaceships that would one day return to Earth and finish what the Nazis started. In 2018 the invasion begins.
The Finnish-German-Australian co-production proved the second most popular film the day the box office opened at the festival, also called the Berlinale, according to Berlin's Tagesspiegel newspaper. It was beaten to the top spot by Don – The King is Back, the latest film from Bollywood megastar Shah Rukh Khan. Fans of the Indian heartthrob camped out in a Berlin shopping centre for three days and nights in order to get tickets for the film, which sold out in minutes.
But elsewhere it was business as usual at the traditionally rather serious festival. This year's event, the 62nd, focuses on social upheaval and political awakening, screening documentaries and fictional works from Arab film-makers, which trace the turbulent progress of the 2011 mass uprisings across the region and explore political and philosophical questions left in the wake of the often bloody demonstrations.
The Egyptian film Reporting a Revolution, directed by Bassam Mortada, follows six journalists on the frontline during 18 days of anti-regime protests in 2011. In the Shadow of a Man, directed by Hanan Abdalla, has four women talking about how a new society should look.
The film festival is well known for engaging in political debate. Last year, it became a platform to protest against the arrest of the Iranian director Jafar Panahi. Accused of inciting opposition protests in 2009 and making a film without permission, Panahi was banned from travelling outside Iran and was consequently unable to take up the seat he had been offered on the Berlinale jury.
This year the festival will continue the debate about the position of the artist in society with the international premiere of a documentary about the dissident Chinese artist Ai Weiwei.
But it's not all doom and gloom. Berlinale organisers have coaxed some of Hollywood's biggest names to sprinkle a little stardust over the icy German capital. Jolie will be hawking The Land of Blood and Honey, her directorial debut about the Yugoslavian civil war, while Javier Bardem will screen the documentary he produced, Sons of the Clouds: the Last Colony, about a forgotten colonial war in the western Sahara and its abandoned victims. Meryl Streep will sweep into town to accept an honorary Golden Bear – Berlin's answer to the Palme d'or – as a recognition of her 30-plus-year reign at the top of Hollywood's tree.
The biggest screams on the red carpet are likely to be reserved for Robert Pattinson, the British dreamboat who stars in the wildly popular vampire movie series, Twilight. The teen idol is expected to show up to promote his new film, an adaptation of Guy de Maupassant's novel Bel Ami, in which he plays a scoundrel who rises through the ranks of 19th-century Parisian society by manipulating and seducing women.
This year, the organisers have gathered together a surprisingly starry jury to award the prizes. Jake Gyllenhaal and Charlotte Gainsbourg join the Dutch photographer and film-maker Anton Corbijn (who had a hit with the Joy Division film Control) on the international jury, which is chaired by the veteran British director Mike Leigh.
One film vying for the award, Les Adieux la Reine (Farewell My Queen), starring Diane Kruger as Marie Antoinette, will launch the festival on Thursday with its world premiere.
The Berlinale, which runs until 19 February, is ranked as one of the world's top film festivals alongside Cannes, Toronto, Sundance and Venice.

Harrison Ford not set for Blade Runner sequel, say producers

The producers of Ridley Scott's forthcoming follow-up deny reports actor is being considered to reprise role from 1982 sci-fi classic

Blade Runner
Replicant revival ... Harrison Ford hangs on in the original Blade Runner. Photograph: Allstar/Cinetext/Warner Bros
The producers of Ridley Scott's forthcoming followup to his 1982 sci-fi cult classic Blade Runner have denied that Harrison Ford is returning to the role of Rick Deckard.
  1. Blade Runner - The Director's Cut
  2. Production year: 1982
  3. Country: USA
  4. Cert (UK): 15
  5. Runtime: 117 mins
  6. Directors: Ridley Scott
  7. Cast: Darryl Hannah, Daryl Hannah, Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, Sean Young
  8. More on this film


Twitchfilm reported yesterday that Ford was in early talks to reprise his role as the future cop, who is tasked with hunting down a gang of rogue bioengineered humanoids, called "replicants", in Scott's earlier film, itself based on the Philip K Dick novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? However, producer Andrew Kosove of Alcon Entertainment told Deadline: "It is absolutely patently false that there has been any discussion about Harrison Ford being in Blade Runner. To be clear, what we are trying to do with Ridley now is go through the painstaking process of trying to break the back of the story, figure out the direction we're going to take the movie and find a writer to work on it. The casting of the movie could not be further from our minds at this moment."

Kosove compared the Blade Runner followup to Scott's long-awaited forthcoming return to science fiction, Prometheus, which has been described as a film which is not a prequel or sequel, but exists within "the same universe" as its predecessor, 1979's Alien.

"What Ridley does in Prometheus is a good template for what we're trying to do," he said. "He created something that has some association to the original Alien, but lives on its own as a standalone movie." Kosove was asked if Scott's plans might allow Ford to return. "In advance of knowing what we're going to do, I supposed you could say yes, he could," he replied. "But I think it is quite unlikely."

Talk of Ford returning to the series sparked huge online debate yesterday, with many arguing that the actor's appearance in the movie would ruin Blade Runner's central enigma: whether Deckard is himself a replicant. The point has been argued back and forth by fans in the 30 years since the original film's release, resurfacing whenever a fresh cut of the film emerges. There have been several of these: Scott's 1992 director's cut, which excised the original version's studio-enforced expositional voiceover and pegged-on "happy ending", seen by many as the definitive version.